Bureaucrats, ninja, Administrators
1,554
edits
Changes
no edit summary
'''''That is purely ridiculous...'''''
Alot of really good bands do not qualify due to one or more of those ''guidelines'', so they are penalized. And on other ''another snobbish WikiWikis'', it's editors can be real sticklers about their ''suggest guidelines for acceptance'' to their precious Wiki. Why? Famous does not necessarily mean good. There are alot of "popular" things that are horrible. We do not rule talent by "chart sales". Lots of '''crap''' sells well, yet it talentless noise. Hip hop proves this formula with flawless perfection.
Well, not here. Granted, we are not out to be a '''''local band repository''''', but if a band is good and noteworthy, they should be mentioned.
*Add your band and releases. ''(but don't get pissy if we remove it. '''Odds are we won't''', but we might)''
<B>Thanks to a recent spamming assholespammer, this is no longer a public wiki, in which you can just register and immediately edit/vandalize articles.</B>
''Unfortunately from now on, to contribute you'll have to '''REGISTER'''''. After which, you will have to validate your email address and account before ANY edits or page creating goes down. We do not want a bunch of bots or idiots jerking anyone around.
